Drakenterprises

Not clinical advice. Clinical Evidence is a current-awareness feed. It is not a clinical decision-support system, not medical advice, and not a substitute for clinical judgment, institutional protocols, or the original sources. Full text, NCCN recommendations, and Cochrane review bodies are not reproduced here.

Home · cardiology

JACCArticle

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement or Medical Treatment for Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Valve Stenosis: REBOOT-PARADOX.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology · ACC · 08/28/2026

Authors: Mehilli, Julinda; Steffen, Julius; Rudolph, Tanja; Haum, Magda; Giannini, Christina; Stark, Konstantin; Ince, Hüseyin; Conradi, Lenard; Joner, Michael; Schäfer, Andreas; Karcher, Ann-Katrin; Landt, Martin; Adam, Matti; Thiele, Holger; Geisler, Tobias; Jochheim, David; Hagl, Christian; Zeymer, Uwe; Windecker, Stephan; Massberg, Steffen

Publication types: Journal Article

PubMed abstract / permitted excerpt

BACKGROUND: Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient (pLFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) has an adverse prognosis in comparison to other AS subtypes. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has never been compared with optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone in a dedicated randomized trial in this population. OBJECTIVES: The trial sought to determine whether TAVR added to OMT reduces all-cause mortality in symptomatic patients with pLFLG AS. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label trial, patients with symptomatic pLFLG AS (aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm, mean gradient <40 mm Hg, stroke volume index <35 mL/m, ejection fraction ≥50%) were randomly assigned 2:1 to TAVR plus OMT or OMT alone. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, assessed 2 years after enrollment of the last patient. Enrollment was stopped prematurely for slow recruitment. RESULTS: Of 783 planned patients, 120 (median age 82 years; 53.3% women) were randomized (80 TAVR, 40 OMT). A total of 19 OMT patients eventually crossed over to TAVR, most for symptom progression. The primary endpoint occurred in 29.0% vs 37.1% (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.41-1.66; P = 0.60), and 5-year mortality was 44.9% vs 56.6% (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.43-1.35; P = 0.35). TAVR was associated with improved symptoms (NYHA functional class I/II at 1 year, 83.0% vs 59.0%) and lower cumulative incidence of first endpoint-related rehospitalizations, and there were no differences in functional capacity or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Although the effect of TAVR on mortality remains unresolved, these findings support an individualized strategy with close surveillance and timely TAVR upon clinical deterioration in selected patients with pLFLG AS. Adequately powered randomized trials are needed to define the effect of early TAVR on prognosis. (accuRate Evaluation of Benefit with Optimal medical treatment with or withOut Transcatheter valve repair of PARADOXical low flow low gradient aortic stenosis [REBOOT-PARADOX Trial]; NCT03863132).

Full-text bodies are not stored. ACC/JACC via PubMed and official hub. Society landing pages are verify-at-source links.

Related trial IDs

Clinical Evidence