Drakenterprises

Not clinical advice. Clinical Evidence is a current-awareness feed. It is not a clinical decision-support system, not medical advice, and not a substitute for clinical judgment, institutional protocols, or the original sources. Full text, NCCN recommendations, and Cochrane review bodies are not reproduced here.

Home · cross-cutting

NEJMArticle

Immediate Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Syncope.

The New England journal of medicine · 08/31/2026

Authors: Reed, Matthew J; Goodacre, Steve; Weir, Christopher J; Dinsmore, Lynn; Nugent, Amy; Kennel, Titouan; Lang, Christopher C; Grubb, Neil R; Thokala, Praveen; Kilcoyne, Karen; O'Brien, Rachel; Blackstock, Caroline; McDonald, Shona; Freeman, Nicola; Clarke, Ellise; Adamestam, Imad; Taylor, Louise; ASPIRED Investigators

Publication types: Journal Article

PubMed abstract / permitted excerpt

BACKGROUND: In patients with syncope who present to the emergency department for evaluation, diagnosing an underlying cardiac arrhythmia remains difficult. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, randomized, controlled trial at 45 hospitals in the United Kingdom to assess the effects of 14-day cardiac monitoring on diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes among patients with syncope. Adults with syncope that remained unexplained after an evaluation in the emergency department were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo 14-day ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring (the intervention group) or to receive the standard care provided for patients with unexplained syncope at each participating site (the standard-care group). The primary outcome was the mean number of patient-reported episodes of syncope at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 2234 patients underwent randomization: 1123 were assigned to the intervention group and 1111 to the standard-care group. The mean age of the patients was 58.3 years, and 52.1% were male. After the exclusion of patients who did not complete any follow-up, a total of 1970 patients (1004 in the intervention group and 966 in the standard-care group) were included in the primary analysis. The mean (±SD) number of patient-reported syncope episodes at 1 year was 1.37±5.10 in the intervention group and 1.58±8.56 in the standard-care group (incidence rate ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.18; P = 0.42). A total of 49 adverse events were reported in the intervention group, and 8 adverse events were reported in the standard-care group, with 1 serious adverse event in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with syncope that remained unexplained after evaluation in the emergency department, the use of 14-day ambulatory ECG monitoring did not result in significantly fewer patient-reported syncope episodes at 1 year than standard care. (Funded by the British Heart Foundation and National Health Service Research Scotland; ASPIRED ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN10278811.).

Full-text bodies are not stored. Official eTOC RSS plus PubMed abstracts. Full text remains on nejm.org (institutional access as applicable).

Clinical Evidence