Drakenterprises

Not clinical advice. Clinical Evidence is a current-awareness feed. It is not a clinical decision-support system, not medical advice, and not a substitute for clinical judgment, institutional protocols, or the original sources. Full text, NCCN recommendations, and Cochrane review bodies are not reproduced here.

Home · cross-cutting

NEJMRCT

Azacitidine-Venetoclax or Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

The New England journal of medicine · 09/03/2026

Authors: Fathi, Amir T; Perl, Alexander E; Fell, Geoffrey G; Jonas, Brian A; Ragon, Brittany K; Mims, Alice S; Borate, Uma; Mannis, Gabriel N; Quillen, Karen; Stahl, Maximilian; Aubrey, Brandon J; Koller, Paul; Artz, Andrew S; Al Malki, Monzr M; Stein, Anthony S; Marcucci, Guido; Peters, Mary Linton B; Graubert, Timothy A; Westervelt, Peter; Amrein, Philip C

Publication types: Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase II

PubMed abstract / permitted excerpt

BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy has long been a key component of curative therapy for fit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), despite its frequently severe side effects and substantial health care utilization. For patients who are ineligible for induction chemotherapy, hypomethylating therapy plus venetoclax is the standard treatment owing to its efficacy and side-effect profile. METHODS: In this multicenter, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, previously untreated adults with AML who were eligible for induction chemotherapy to receive either azacitidine plus venetoclax or induction chemotherapy. Patients with core binding factor fusions, mutations in the gene encoding FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (), or mutations in the gene encoding nucleophosmin-1 (; unless the patient was ≥60 years of age) were excluded. The primary end point was event-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients underwent randomization, with 86 patients assigned to each group. The median age of the patients was 64 years. A total of 72% of the patients had adverse-risk disease according to the European LeukemiaNet 2022 classification. At a median follow-up of 21.9 months, the median event-free survival was 14.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.4 to 24.4) in the azacitidine-venetoclax group, as compared with 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 10.1) in the induction chemotherapy group, corresponding to a hazard ratio for event or death of 0.57 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.84; P = 0.002 by the stratified log-rank test). Infection of grade 3 or higher occurred in 28% of the patients (95% CI, 19 to 39) receiving azacitidine-venetoclax and in 41% of those (95% CI, 30 to 52) receiving induction chemotherapy; hemorrhage of grade 3 or higher occurred in 2% (95% CI, 0.3 to 8) and 12% (95% CI, 6 to 20), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 2, randomized trial, azacitidine-venetoclax therapy led to significantly longer event-free survival than induction chemotherapy among induction-eligible patients with AML. (Funded by AbbVie and others; PARADIGM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04801797.).

Full-text bodies are not stored. Official eTOC RSS plus PubMed abstracts. Full text remains on nejm.org (institutional access as applicable).

Related trial IDs

Clinical Evidence