Drakenterprises

Not clinical advice. Clinical Evidence is a current-awareness feed. It is not a clinical decision-support system, not medical advice, and not a substitute for clinical judgment, institutional protocols, or the original sources. Full text, NCCN recommendations, and Cochrane review bodies are not reproduced here.

All trials

TrialNCT07493473

Parascapular Sub Iliocostalis Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Plane Block for Traumatic Multiple Rib Fractures

Status
RECRUITING
Phase
NA
Last update posted
09/03/2026
Start
05/01/2025
Sponsor
Zagazig University
Specialties
orthopaedics, cross-cutting

Conditions: Discitis of Thoracic Region

Brief summary

Pain control of rib fractures is essential for not only primary pain relief but also preventing secondary complications such as atelectasis or pneumonia which increase the hospital stay, as well as the transition to chronic pain. The cornerstones of analgesic management are oral and intravenous medications such as paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids as well as regional block techniques as paravertebral block and thoracic epidural. To avoid opioid as well as regional block related side effects such as pneumothorax and hemodynamic instability, previous studies showed that superficial chest wall block such as thoracic erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block had shown a promising success in management of such pain with few side effects. In an effort to reduce the pain score, hospital stay and improve the patient's capability of physiotherapy this study compares continuous block of parascapular sub-iliocostalis plane block versus continuous thoracic paravertebral block for analgesia in patients with traumatic multiple rib fractures.

Protocol documents and results are not hosted here. Verify every detail on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Clinical Evidence